Devil Boys From Beyond Expectations

Posted by Broadway Doctor Thursday, December 2, 2010 1 comments



On of my­ readers gave me tickets to see Devil Boys from Beyond at New World Stages before it closes, which is untimely ending its run on Sunday. I enjoyed this production, which began as a Fringe show, and exists still as a very intimate production. I don’t exactly know why this show is ending its run early, except that like many shows, it couldn’t find an audience. And who is at fault, the marketing/advertising teams? It’s funny that if a show fails, we often blame the marketing and ads people, but if a show succeeds, it’s because the show sells itself. This is hardly the case.  It’s clear that when a good show, in a niche market, can’t get the word out to its target audience, that someone didn’t do their job right.

Here’s what Devil Boys From Beyond should have done:

1) Different show art. The collage imagery on the logo is not eye catching. For a show that features Drag Queens and shirtless muscled men,  the artwork hides a lot of the sexual content. There is more potential here for sex appeal in all advertising. I’m sure there are people out there who would see any type of show in the camp/drag genre.  Similarly, there are women, bachelorette parties, (and plenty of men too) who would pay to see the shirtless body-building aliens. Look at the success of the Naked Boys Singing franchise. The title of this show is just as catchy, but the artwork and advertising are too tame. In fact, I was surprised when I saw this show, at what genre it really was. Perhaps the producers and promoters were trying to hide the fact that this show could be considered “gay” theatre, in efforts to appeal to a wider audience. But I think they may have lost their core market by being to vague.

2) Reach out to Sci-fi markets. New York Comic Con was in late October. This would have been a perfect place to promote the show. Perhaps they did show some sort of presence. But I would have arranged a performance, a cast table (in costume) and everything else. Can devil boys afford to advertise on television? Perhaps on Sci-fi channel it’s less expensive than to advertise on say, NBC. There is also specialized radio too.

3) Stunts. There are plenty of publicity stunts that could have been staged to promote this show. Perhaps the shirtless ‘Devil Boys’ could have staged an invasion on Wall Street, or Grand Central Station.  There are viral video potentials that would easily be picked up by theatre and sci-fi, and college humor websites. Where were the Aliens handing out flyers in times square? Just about everyone has costumed flyer people nowadays, maybe I just missed them? Think of all the video blog possibilities in Campy 1950’s style, documenting the abduction. This isn’t even that expensive to do anymore, everyone has a camera that records digital video, and a computer with access to youtube.

4) Get the word out. The NY Times reviewed Devil Boys at Fringe, and it was very positive. The first rule of promoting theatre is to flash your NY Times review in everyone’s face. This show had a series of good reviews.  But where were the quote advertisements?

5) Off-Broadway commercial runs are hard in this economic climate. Especially for non-musicals. So perhaps I would have waited and tried to find a regional or NY theatre to produce the show as part of their season. There is room for expansion, less financial risk, free promotion, and larger audiences.

6) Stunt cast someone. Anyone! Find an old B-movie actor who hasn’t done anything in a long time. Put them in one of the adult drag roles, or put them as the chief reporter. Anyone from a horror movie, sci-fi show, or just a small cult following who like subculture theatre, they could plot them in. Even if people don’t recognize the name, people often recognize that other people might know who they are, and have some importance they don’t know about. Stunt casting is a powerful, and sometimes necessary part of commercial theatre. I would have gotten at least one “name” to promote.

How to fix Women on the Verge

Posted by Broadway Doctor Wednesday, December 1, 2010 1 comments


Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown is the star-studded musical of the fall, toting Broadway giants Patti LuPone, Brian Stokes Mitchell, Sherie Rene Scott, Danny Burstein and Laura Benanti among others. The show was highly anticipated, but was critically slammed. The show's director Bartlett Sher was certainly pulling out all the stops with this show; so much so that technical issues caused the first few preview performances to be canceled. It seemed as if Mr. Sher was trying to top his critically acclaimed revival of South Pacific which enjoyed an extended commercial run at Lincoln Center. Since its closing, Lincoln Center was looking for the next big commercial enterprise, putting Women on the Verge, in the newly renovated Belasco Theater closer to Times Square. And with Mr. Sher set to direct what could go wrong? Too much, too soon. This show would have greatly benefitted from an out-of-town tryout, like among other disasters this fall (Spider-Man). I refrained from writing about this show for several weeks because the stakes are not that high for Lincoln Center Theater and their multi-million dollar seasons, hundreds of subscribers, and my general appreciation for what they have to offer. Of course, by now Women on the Verge is old news. So I suppose I can write freely about my true thoughts, with lesser backlash. People have moved on to bigger and badder things...

How To FIX Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown:
(**SPOILERS**)

1) Why did they cut Sherie's first song? The show opens with Sherie's character Pepa dreaming, her bed spinning wildly. Her answering machine goes off, it's her lover Ivan (Brian Stokes Mitchell), she wakes up, but misses the call. She runs offstage. Without a single line of dialogue. It is my understanding that she used to have a song at this moment, something too somber and depressing to start this kind of show-that-tries-to-be-a-farce musical. The show then opens with "Madrid," sung by Danny Burstein the city's wise but eccentric taxi driver. It feels rushed now, the opening loses its beat. It's clear a song is missing, even before someone told me they cut a song. If not a whole song, could Pepa not sing a line or stanza, before the music transitions to "Madrid"? Imagine the opening of Mamma Mia if you will, two lines from a somber song, before the opening scene. There needs to be something to kick off Pepa's character.

2) Fire Danny Burstein. Harsh, I know. I'm a huge fan of Mr. Burstein from both The Drowsy Chaperone, and South Pacific, and this role would be inspired casting for him, except, he can't hit the notes. He's not a sweet belty singer, and the Spanish-pop vibe of the opening "Madrid" number really needs someone who can sore with riffs and has a real Latin flavor. Where was Piragua Guy when they were casting this show?

3) The story is a farce, but why all the sad music? The majority of the show is slow, somber ballads, which at some points bring the plot to a standstill. The film on which the musical is based, was a black comedy farce, but this production turns the story into a melodrama, that's more mellow than drama. This is supposed to be a comedy. One of the best songs (and performances) is Laura Benanti's number in the first act, as the character Candela. Why is it one of the best songs, and why does Laura give the best performance in the show? Because the song is fast, funny and bright. This song picks the audience up to the level at which this production needs. There need to be more fast funny songs for this show to work properly. I would also like to say right now, that I personally like the score to this show. Many of the songs have good melodies, and sound lovely with the female singers. The orchestrations and beat are very unique and Spanish. But the slower style is just not right for telling this story. The show should be more madcap in the first act, with one really great power ballad in Act 1 (the one where Pepa lights the bed on fire). The second act should be the same, upbeat numbers, and then Patti LuPone's "Invisible" which is in my opinion the strongest song in the show. The songs are great, but this is one of those times where you have to rewrite for the sake of the show as a whole.

4) Too much collage in projections. There are so many moving sets, and video projections that the scenic imagery is very broken up. Both need to be toned down dramatically. Unless you're sitting directly center, the projections on the layers of set will be indistinguishable from any side seats, or balcony seats. The effect is often jarbled and chaotic. There are some beautiful images of Madrid they can create artistically without becoming a surrealist painting. And what's with the video game graphics in the car scene? Why would anyone put such hideous computer animation behind the driving care prop, that is too sharp, and too surreal. It's like a scene from Tron. Couldn't they find a better illustrated image of Madrid to use?

So there it is. My four biggest points on how to fix Women on the Verge. This show needed an out-of-town tryout, but Lincoln Center can afford to lose money, they're not-for-profit. They just need to learn that not every show is going to be the next South Pacific, and this level of talent will think twice next time. Many of them have already spoken out.

I should also note that on the night I attended, at curtain call, while the curtain was falling, everyone was still bowing and waving at the audience, but Patti LuPone bolted off the stage. My guess is she's the first to leave every night.